Need for Establishing Standards in Face Detection Technology

There is nothing in this world called foolproof security. No shield is 100 percent perfect. Every security measure has loopholes and shortcomings. Face detection is no exception! Chances of False Accept Rate (FAR) and False Reject Rate (FRR) exist in this technology as in other technologies like fingerprint, iris, etc. There are eighty nodal points on the face on the basis of which the system recognizes an individual. If the number taken into consideration at the time of verification is too little or too much, the system accepts or rejects a face falsely. Possibility to err prevails; be it the biometric access control, visitor management, time attendance, or any other.

It is important to have good quality biometric access control for maximum accuracy in identification. Many vendors claim to provide high quality devices. Still, the system falters very often. This should not be the case! Or else, overall general opinion about face detection may get poor. People may lose faith in this technology and may deter from accepting it in their day-to-day life. It is necessary for the use of such products to grow as they promise enhanced protection. Development of these products rests in the hands of the general public. They ought to accept the change from conventional security system to this modern instrument. This mentality can be fostered only by quality products in the market.

A governing body for all the face detection products ought to be formulated. It should set standards for products like biometric access control, visitor management, and time attendance. Standards as such help users in making a choice. They may know for sure that the governing body approved product is of better quality than the one which is not approved. For example, companies look for service providers who abide by international accounting standards at the time of outsourcing accounting services. Those who follow the standards prescribed by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) may rarely make blunders in their practice.

Many companies get their products ISO certified. However, its most popular standards are only generalized certificate. Products from fields that are completely different from biometry may also secure the same certificate. National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) has also not been able to come up with something considerable in the field of face detection. There should be a world body with various countries as its members. Government in these countries may fund the organization. It should carry out research and analysis related to this technology. Based on its findings, it can set standards for manufacturers of this product to follow.

Standards as such may improve the quality of the face detection products available in the market further. Besides, vendors may also get a point to boast about in their products. Standards are favorable, not only for biometrics but for all the products in the market. Majority of the products and services have set standards to follow. Facial recognition should not remain left out. It is a new technology and is in its developmental stages. Its further growth depends on the current practices of the vendors. Formulating standards help in the progress of the mechanism.

Visit our site : http://www.facerecognitionsolution.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Comments are closed.